Amounts and Frequency of Milk Replacer Fed to Calves Under Heat Stress - Cowsmo

Amounts and Frequency of Milk Replacer Fed to Calves Under Heat Stress

New study in the Journal of Dairy Science® examines optimal feeding strategies for dairy calves raised in warm environments.

Calves raised during the heat of summer have reduced growth, increased disease incidence, and higher mortality rates compared with those raised in temperate environments or neutral thermal conditions. The reduced average daily weight gain observed in the summer can be partially attributed to heat stress. In a new report published ahead of the February 2022 issue of the Journal of Dairy Science®, scientists from the University of Georgia (Athens, GA, USA) investigated the effects of rate and frequency of milk replacer feeding on performance, emptying of the abomasum (one of the bovine forestomachs), and nutrient digestibility among young calves during summer and winter in the warm environment of the southeastern United States.

When calves are exposed to heat stress, their food intake is reduced, resulting in lower total energy and nutrient consumption. Additionally, animals in adverse environments experience dramatic physiological and behavioral changes to cope with distress. For example, calves in an environment with elevated ambient temperature (≥20°C, or 68°F) sweat and pant to dissipate heat and maintain their core body temperature.

Lead investigator Sha Tao, PhD, explains, “These physiological responses, although beneficial for survival, shift available energy from growth to maintenance. In combination with the lower food consumption, calves raised during summer have limited energy available for growth.” Therefore, the research team speculated that increasing energy intake by feeding more milk or milk replacer should support greater growth during summer.

By dividing the calves in the study into groups of high or low amounts of milk replacer and high or low frequency of feeding (three times a day vs. twice a day), the team tested their hypothesis. From a previous study by the group (Orellana Rivas et al., 2020), the researchers already knew that too much milk replacer would have detrimental and dangerous health effects on the calves when fed twice a day during summer. This helped them set an upper limit on the amount to be fed.

Starter grain and milk replacer intakes were recorded daily, respiration rate and rectal temperature were recorded three times a week, and structural growth and body weight were measured weekly. Rate of abomasal emptying, a critical factor that regulates energy and nutrient utilization in preweaning calves, was determined using an acetaminophen absorption blood test. Finally, apparent digestibility of nutrients was measured using chromic oxide as a marker in the feed.

The scientists found that feeding three times a day reduced calves’ respiration rates during summer and reduced rectal temperature during winter. Increasing the milk replacer amount at each meal improved body weight gain and structural growth. Feeding more times per day tended to improve growth during winter but, surprisingly, not during summer. In both seasons, calves offered higher amounts of milk replacer had greater intake, supporting greater intakes of protein, fat, and metabolizable energy, necessary components for growth. “Our team found no effect of treatment on nutrient digestibility,” said Tao, “and increasing feeding frequency accelerated abomasal emptying.”

Tao concluded, “These data indicate that increasing feeding frequency lowers heat load. This may be due to reduced metabolic heat production, increased heat dissipation, or both.” The team’s findings represent a step toward optimization of feeding strategies for young cows in hot environments, a major sector of dairy production, to help maximize calf growth, health, and welfare, and thus also to improve profit margins in dairy production.

Editor’s Note: The article is “Effects of milk replacer feeding rate and frequency of preweaning dairy calves in the southeastern United States: Performance, abomasal emptying, and nutrient digestibility,” by Ruth M. Orellana Rivas, Thalyane Rodrigues, Jordana da Silveira E. Sousa, Victor H.L.R. Melo, Jing Gao, Diego Ferreira de Araújo, Juliana Goncalves de Souza, Thiago N. Marins, Pedro Melendez, John K. Bernard, and Sha Tao. It appears online ahead of the Journal of Dairy Science, volume 105, issue 2 (February 2022), published by Fass Inc. and Elsevier.



Scroll to Top